|
The forgoing list is meant to be illustrative not exhaustive. Only the
most common |
. |
elements or minerals possessing structural types that can be modeled with
Polymorf |
. |
are
included. |
. |
The fact that many of these mineral groups are isostructural indicates that
their |
. |
underlying structural framework is as important in determining the group's
physical |
. |
and
chemical properties as is their individual chemical composition. The
topological |
. |
approach and the compositional approach to describing matter therefore
should be |
. |
seen as both sides of the same coin. The one cannot be fully
appreciated without the |
. |
other. |
. |
Topological classification system |
Another classification scheme emphasizes the internal structure of minerals
and |
the coordination of its constituent atom species. It arranges minerals
by the type and |
percent occupation of interstitial voids present in their crystal
structures, that is by the |
way
that the atoms pack together. |
Factors that affect how atoms of different species pack together include
their |
relative sizes, the direction and strength of the bonding forces of each
atom type, and |
the
necessity for electronic neutrality of the structure. |
Atoms that pack together as the result of ionic or metallic bonds between
them |
tend to generate structures that are closely packed together.
Covalently bonded |
atoms are oriented in specific directions relative to each other which
affects how they |
pack together to form solids. |
There are a few compounds formed from different elements with nearly equal |
atomic volumes, and therefore can be modeled like the pure elements as one
type of |
close packing or another. But the constituent atomic species of most
compounds |
have different volumes and therefore pack together according to the ratio of
the |
different atoms' volumes. Given the wide range of atomic radii
exhibited by the |
elements and the thousands of different combinations they can achieve with
each |
other, compounds can exhibit a wide range in the radius ratios of their
constituent |
atom species. |
However, certain specific ratios of atomic radii give rise to general types
of |
mineral structures based on how the different sized atoms pack together.
Typically |
the
relatively larger non-metallic atoms, or anions (X), in a compound pack
together |
so
as to provide interstitial voids between them which can accommodate the |
relatively
smaller metal ions, or cations (A). In the following figure the
largest size |
sphere
represents the anion with a radius of one and the smaller spheres are
cations |
of the various critical sizes. The smaller A atoms can be accommodated
in holes |
. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Figure 56 -
Critical radius ratio values for |
cubic,
octahedral, and tetrahedral |
coordination of interstitial atoms |
|
|
|
|
|
|
formed by packing the largest X atom with a radius of 1.0 in the shape of a
cube (void |
size .732), an
octahedron (void size .414), and a tetrahedron (void size .225). |
. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Figure
57 - Cubic, |
tetrahedral and |
octahedral
voids |
click
image to enlarge |
|
|
|
|
cubic (AX8) |
octahedral (AX6) |
tetrahedral (AX4) |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
Thus these ratios result in eight large X atoms being coordinated around the |
smaller A atom in the cubic arrangement, six X atoms in the octahedral
arrangement, |
and four X
atoms in the tetrahedral arrangement. Other, less common coordinations |
are
trigonal prismatic with coordination six and a radius ratio of .528,
square anti- |
prismatic with coordination eight and a radius ratio of .645, and triangular
with |
coordination three and a radius ratio of .155 . And as already
demonstrated for the |
elements, compounds with radius ratios approaching one, that is with equal
radius |
atoms, usually pack with coordination twelve. Simply put, the
coordination number, |
or
ligancy, increases with an increase in the radius ratio. |
Back to
Knowhere |
 |
Page
39 - Structure matters - Interstitial voids |
 |